Tensions between the United States and Mexico have risen after FBI Director Kash Patel shared details online about a high-profile arrest in Mexico, raising concerns over foreign interference, sensitive intelligence, and respect for Mexican law.
The row centres on the capture of Ryan Wedding, a former Canadian Olympic snowboarder accused of running a violent drug trafficking network linked to the Sinaloa cartel.
The controversy matters because Mexico has strict laws limiting the activities of foreign agents on its soil, and any breach risks damaging cross-border security cooperation that directly affects the UK’s allies and global drug enforcement efforts.
What exactly happened in the Ryan Wedding arrest?
On 23 January, the US Department of Justice announced the arrest of Ryan Wedding, a former Olympic athlete turned alleged drug lord.
US officials accuse Wedding of leading an international drugs ring connected to several murders and operating under the protection of Mexico’s Sinaloa cartel.

According to Ron Johnson, the US ambassador to Mexico, Wedding surrendered to authorities in Mexico City. Mexican officials later echoed that version of events, saying he voluntarily surrendered.
However, the situation became complicated after FBI Director Kash Patel posted on X (formerly Twitter), where he has around 1.9 million followers, describing the arrest as a joint on-the-ground operation involving US and Mexican forces.
Kash Patel tweeted about the FBI’s role in apprehending Ryan Wedding on Mexican soil.
But it was apparently supposed to be a secret. And it’s set off a bit of an international incident, per WSJ.
Now Mexico’s president is disputing Patel’s account. pic.twitter.com/iUyv5epQVJ
— Aaron Blake (@AaronBlake) January 29, 2026
That claim appeared to contradict Mexico’s public stance and triggered a political headache in Mexico City.
Why are Kash Patel’s social media posts causing tensions in Mexico?
The heart of the Kash Patel Mexico tensions lies in Mexican law.
In 2020, Mexico passed legislation that limits foreign agents’ activities, requiring them to:
- Share all intelligence with Mexican authorities
- Avoid unilateral law enforcement operations
- Respect Mexico’s sovereignty
By publicly stating that US forces were directly involved in the arrest, Patel appeared to suggest that American agents operated on Mexican soil, something the law tightly restricts.
In a later interview with Vanity Fair, Patel went even further, saying: “This was a complex, high-stakes operation with zero margin for error.
I was on the ground with our team in Mexico and witnessed extraordinary teamwork, precision, and trust between our agents and partners in Mexico.”
Those comments fuelled claims that the US acted more independently than Mexico’s government wanted to admit publicly.
Did the FBI reveal sensitive or classified information?
US officials remain divided. An unnamed US official, quoted by the Wall Street Journal, said the FBI’s involvement was intended to remain secret, partly to avoid embarrassing Mexico’s leadership.
The same report said Patel’s disclosures left Mexico’s President Claudia Sheinbaum in a “thorny position”, forcing her to publicly defend a version of events that now faces international scrutiny. However, the FBI strongly denies any wrongdoing.
An FBI spokesperson said claims Patel shared secret information were: “Totally false.”
The spokesperson added, “The operation was a tremendous success in collaboration with our Mexican partners.
This was our sixth Ten Most Wanted capture in just a year; you don’t get there without strong leadership and partnerships.”
Another US official confirmed the post was accurate and coordinated with partners, suggesting no intelligence rules were broken.
Why did Mexico insist the suspect surrender?
At a press conference earlier this week, President Claudia Sheinbaum repeated that Wedding surrendered voluntarily at the US Embassy in Mexico City.
To support that claim, she shared what appeared to be an Instagram image allegedly posted by Wedding himself, showing him outside the embassy.
The caption read: “After seeking guarantees for a fair process, I have decided to voluntarily turn myself in to the authorities.” However, the image quickly unravelled.
Was the Instagram image fake or AI-generated?
Several media outlets raised doubts about the image’s authenticity. CBC News later confirmed the photo was AI-generated and that the Instagram account could not be reliably linked to Wedding.
When questioned, Sheinbaum defended the post, saying: “There’s nothing from Meta that says it’s AI, and every social network has that policy.”
The episode added to confusion and embarrassment, especially as misinformation spread rapidly online.
What does Ryan Wedding’s lawyer say?
The wedding’s defence team directly contradicted both governments. His lawyer, Anthony Colombo, told reporters outside court: “He was arrested. He didn’t surrender.”
Colombo added that if US agents entered Mexico without full transparency, concerns were justified: “If the US government is unilaterally going into a sovereign country and apprehending somebody, you can understand the concern. But he was apprehended.”
This statement reinforced claims that the public story may not match what happened behind the scenes.
Why does this matter beyond the US and Mexico?
Although this dispute centres on North America, it has wider implications.
The UK works closely with both the US and Mexican authorities on:
- International drug trafficking
- Financial crime
- Extradition and intelligence sharing
Any breakdown in trust between Washington and Mexico City could weaken global efforts against organised crime, including drug routes that ultimately affect the UK market.
Experts also warn that senior officials using social media casually risk exposing sensitive operations and straining diplomatic relationships.
Key facts at a glance
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Arrest date | 23 January |
| Suspect | Ryan Wedding |
| Background | Former Canadian Olympic snowboarder |
| Alleged links | Sinaloa cartel |
| Mexican law | 2020 foreign agents restriction |
| Patel followers on X | ~1.9 million |



