A new round of scrutiny over England’s education curriculum has ignited debate across schools and political circles.
The review, described by officials as “evolution not revolution,” aims to modernise teaching while keeping the system’s strengths intact. Yet, the changes are dividing opinion sharply.
England’s pupils continue to perform fairly well compared to global peers. The review’s sympathizers argue that including a broader range of benefactions to wisdom, literature, and culture is a necessary step toward a further inclusive class.
The thing, they say, is to reflect the different communities shaping knowledge in the UK moment.
What will your child learn under the new curriculum?
Here are five key changes shaping how pupils will build skills for life, work and the future.
Find out more https://t.co/A11UqyL50s pic.twitter.com/bT0y6ifVwA
— Department for Education (@educationgovuk) November 5, 2025
But not everyone is convinced. Shadow Education Secretary Laura Trott warned the reforms could erode students’ understanding of British heritage.
“Education vandalism,” she called it, highlighting what she sees as a concerning trend under the current administration.
Former Conservative schools minister Nick Gibb voiced fears over scrapping the English Baccalaureate (EBacc). He warned this move might reduce the number of students studying foreign languages.
“Subjects like languages could become a luxury only private schools and wealthier families can afford,” he said, raising concerns over widening educational inequality.
Meanwhile, the Liberal Egalitarians have expressed conservative support for the class updates. Education prophet Munira Wilson stressed the significance of practical planning, particularly around academy backing and schoolteacher workloads.
Without it, she advised, reforms threaten to place redundant pressure on formerly stretched staff.
Pepe Di’Iasio, General Secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, welcomed the review’s recommendations as “a sensible, evidence-based set of reforms.”
He, however, emphasised the need for adequate resources. Di’Iasio noted that schools are being asked to meet new “enrichment benchmarks” covering civic engagement, arts, sports, and life skills, but he criticised how arbitrarily these benchmarks are tied to school evaluations.
As the debate continues, preceptors, policymakers, and parents are scuffling with the question England can modernise its class while maintaining high norms. The answer may shape the future of learning for a generation.
